Skip to main content

In the pan­dem­ic, gov­ern­ment and Arts Coun­cil Eng­land built a defen­sive hedge around the most vis­i­ble aspects of the arts infra­struc­ture. Staffers in insti­tu­tions got time, space and mon­ey to address frag­ile busi­ness mod­els and secure their futures. How­ev­er, the emer­gency arts fund­ing schemes for free­lance artists failed to address their artis­tic, emo­tion­al and liveli­hood needs. 

Sig­nif­i­cant­ly though, ear­ly evi­dence from a new qual­i­ta­tive study that demon­strates how the lives and artis­tic prospects of many artists pos­i­tive­ly improved in pan­dem­ic con­di­tions. It offers clues to the shifts in arts pol­i­cy and infra­struc­tures that are nec­es­sary to hon­our and sus­tain the tal­ents and vibran­cy of the diverse artists’ con­stituen­cy in future. 

Read Artists’ pre­car­i­ty is not just about pay on Arts Professional